Boldshaves Oast is a residential care service in Woodchurch, Ashford, Kent, supporting adults with learning disabilities. Its current CQC registration is under Canterbury Oast Trust and began on 2 December 2025. That change is worth understanding because older online information may still identify FitzRoy Support as the provider. CQC has confirmed that the earlier registration was archived when the new one began.
For families researching the service, the most important point is that the current CQC profile has not yet been inspected under Canterbury Oast Trust. The Good ratings displayed on the new profile are inherited from the previous provider’s inspection history. This means those ratings are useful background, but they should not be presented as a new inspection of the current provider.
Who runs Boldshaves Oast now?
Canterbury Oast Trust is the current registered provider. The organisation supports people with learning disabilities and autism in Kent through accommodation, support and training. Its current residential-care information describes Boldshaves Oast as a mid-needs service in Woodchurch.
The change from FitzRoy Support to Canterbury Oast Trust is particularly relevant when searching for reviews, inspection reports or older contact information. The archived FitzRoy record remains available through CQC, but it represents the previous registration. Readers should therefore check the date and provider attached to any information they find online.
The current CQC record lists Boldshaves Oast at Frogs Hole Lane, Woodchurch, Ashford, Kent, TN26 3RA. It identifies learning disabilities among the service specialisms and describes the service as providing accommodation and care for adults.
What does the accommodation look like?
Boldshaves Oast is not a conventional single-building care home. Historical CQC information describes accommodation spread across four buildings, including a converted oast house, log cabins and a cottage. The main building had eight bedrooms across three floors, while other buildings provided additional living space.
The setting is also part of what makes the service distinctive. Older CQC records describe the home as being on a quiet country lane around one and a half miles from Woodchurch village. There were also dedicated areas for activities such as arts and crafts, woodwork and horticulture.
Canterbury Oast Trust currently describes the property as a countryside oast-house home with commercial-style gardening facilities. Its current listing says the accommodation is arranged over two floors and is not suitable for individuals with mobility needs.
That last point is practical rather than cosmetic. Anyone considering the service should discuss mobility, accessibility and individual support requirements with the provider before assuming the accommodation will be suitable.
What does the care focus on?
The available CQC evidence shows a strong emphasis on individual support, independence and participation. During the 2024 assessment under the previous provider, CQC reported that staff knew people well and supported them to take part in activities, employment and holidays. People were also encouraged to take positive risks rather than having every part of daily life unnecessarily restricted.
Older inspections provide additional context. CQC records describe people being supported with cooking, shopping, meal planning, community activities and leisure interests. These findings are historical, so they should be treated as evidence of the service’s previous approach rather than proof that every practice remains unchanged today.
For a prospective resident, this distinction matters. A good residential service should not simply provide accommodation and supervision. The more useful question is whether the support plan matches the person’s communication style, routines, interests, health needs and goals for independence. Those details are best explored directly with the current provider.

What does the CQC history tell us?
The latest detailed assessment available for the previous registration was carried out between 20 May and 3 June 2024. CQC rated the service Good in safe, effective, caring, responsive and well-led areas. Inspectors reported no regulatory breaches during that assessment, although they identified improvements that were needed in record keeping and quality assurance.
The assessment also recorded generally positive feedback from people using the service and their relatives. CQC said people felt safe and that staff treated them with dignity and respect. At the same time, a minority of relatives raised concerns about whether some staff had the right skills for their family member’s needs.
There is another important detail that can easily be missed. The current CQC profile shows the historical ratings from the previous provider and explicitly says that the current service has not yet been inspected. Anyone comparing care services should therefore separate the historical Good rating from the current provider’s performance.
How many people can the service support?
Historical CQC records describe Boldshaves Oast as accommodating up to 15 people, although the practical accommodation was described as 14 residents because bedrooms were not used as double rooms. A 2024 assessment reported 13 people living there at that time.
The current Canterbury Oast Trust listing gives a present occupancy figure of 14 and lists three vacancies. Because vacancies can change, this should be treated as a current provider listing rather than a guaranteed placement offer.
For families looking for a place, vacancy alone should not be the deciding factor. The more useful discussion is whether the existing residents, staffing arrangements, physical environment and support model are appropriate for the person who may move in.
Why gardening and outdoor activities matter
Gardening appears repeatedly in information about Boldshaves Oast and remains part of its current description. Canterbury Oast Trust highlights commercial-style gardening facilities at the service.
That can be particularly relevant for residents who enjoy practical work and outdoor routines. However, it is better to view gardening as one possible activity rather than assume that every resident participates in it. A person’s interests and abilities should guide their daily activities.
Older CQC inspections also recorded a broader range of activities, including arts and crafts, woodwork, community outings, sport and other leisure activities. This history suggests that activity planning has traditionally extended beyond the property itself.
What should a prospective resident check?
The most useful next step is a direct conversation with the current provider and, where possible, a visit to the service. Ask how individual support plans are created, how staffing is arranged, how residents are supported in the community and how activities are matched to personal interests.
It is also worth asking specifically about accessibility, daily routines, healthcare support, communication methods, family involvement and how concerns or complaints are handled. These questions provide much more useful information than relying on a rating alone.
Boldshaves Oast has a long inspection history and a distinctive countryside setting, but the provider change in December 2025 means current information should be separated carefully from historical reports. For anyone considering the service, the best evidence will come from the current CQC record, Canterbury Oast Trust and a direct assessment of whether the home fits the individual’s needs.
Conclusion
Boldshaves Oast remains a well-established residential service with a strong history of supporting adults with learning disabilities in a rural setting. However, the recent change in provider means that much of the publicly available quality information reflects past inspections rather than current performance under Canterbury Oast Trust. While the environment, activities and previous CQC findings provide useful context, they should not replace up-to-date enquiries and personal assessment. Ultimately, the suitability of Boldshaves Oast will depend on how well its current support model, accommodation and staffing align with the individual needs, preferences and long-term goals of each prospective resident.
FAQs
Is Boldshaves Oast currently rated Good?
The current CQC page displays Good ratings, but these ratings were inherited from the previous provider’s inspection history. CQC says the new Canterbury Oast Trust registration has not yet been inspected.
Is Boldshaves Oast suitable for someone with mobility needs?
The current Canterbury Oast Trust listing says the accommodation is not suitable for individuals with mobility needs. Anyone with specific accessibility requirements should discuss them directly with the provider before considering a placement.
Who provides the service now?
Canterbury Oast Trust is the current provider. The previous FitzRoy Support registration was archived on 2 December 2025.
Are places currently available?
Canterbury Oast Trust currently lists three vacancies and an occupancy of 14. Availability can change, so families should confirm the position directly before making arrangements.
